Jump to content
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
Clare

Help With some changes in skills

Question

Hello, I need help to change some things in my emulator with respect to some skills, I thank anyone who can help.
 
1 - I would like to make the Creator class to use the skills
 
Full Protection
Chemical Protection Armor
Chemical Protection Weapon
Chemical Protection Shield
Chemical Protection Helm
 
without it is with equipped items, and when using these skills cancel the status of skill "strip" of the Stalker class
 
Currently these skills the Creator class can not be used if the item is not equipped, and not remove the effect/icon of skill "Strip"
 
2 - I would like to make the Stalker class when using the skill "Strip"
the equipment may not be equipped again until the duration of the skill effect Strip ends because currently the skill Strip removes only the item but the same can be equiped immediately.


10648285_584350125040050_1800283695802822053_o.jpg

 
11705446_584350141706715_952254857275903126_o.jpg
Edited by Suzuya

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Actually I believe 2nd is a bug, as items are not supposed to be equippable in the slot until strip effect ends...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Hi Garr, Thanks for answering :D

I believe the two are bugs, but didn't venture to say that way.
 
I remember the skill Chemical Protection be used by my players (a few years ago in a pre-re server) as a way to "cancel" the effect of the strip, but without being able to utilize the Chemical Protection skills without the need this item equipped, it becomes impossible to use a skill under the influence of "strip" for nullify the effect.
 
You know how to solve these problems?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
Hi, i believe this both 'issue' are not bug.
 
For the first:
The logical is simple, you can't protect what you don't have. So, you can't protect a weapon if you don't have a weapon equipped.
This sounds good for me.
 
For the second:
This is not a bug. You may testing it with a high group_id account. In the code, you have:
 
In: pc.c
Ln: ~922
Function: int pc_isequip(struct map_session_data *sd,int n)
	if(pc_has_permission(sd, PC_PERM_USE_ALL_EQUIPMENT))		return 1;
 
This test occours before any check from strip status. So, if your group_id has permission to equip any itens, it'll ignore the strip from stalker.
Can you test with a low group_id account for us?
Edited by CarlosHenrq

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0

 

Hi, i believe this both 'issue' are not bug.
 
For the first:
The logical is simple, you can't protect what you don't have. So, you can't protect a weapon if you don't have a weapon equipped.
This sounds good for me.
 
For the second:
This is not a bug. You may testing it with a high group_id account. In the code, you have:
 
In: pc.c
Ln: ~922
Function: int pc_isequip(struct map_session_data *sd,int n)
	if(pc_has_permission(sd, PC_PERM_USE_ALL_EQUIPMENT))		return 1;
 
This test occours before any check from strip status. So, if your group_id has permission to equip any itens, it'll ignore the strip from stalker.
Can you test with a low group_id account for us?

 

Omg, Sorry for the second really are the group id, but for the first you can help-me to made this change?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.