Jump to content
Brynner

separate the mob_db and mob_db_re

Recommended Posts

is there any chances to separate those? just like what they did on rathena. to avoid any conflict for fluxcp. because our current mob_db_re still use the mob_db. he only did is to replace the old one.

 

not only the mob_db_re also the mob_skill_db_re.

Edited by bgamez23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm personally against this (well, now the pull request got merged accidentally, but we are still in time to revert it). Is there a reason to need two separate table names? i.e. it doesn't make much sense to have both tables loaded at once, it'll always be either one or the other.

 

Edit: if there's a real reason (other than following rAthena on something that sounds like going backwards), please tell, as I can be easily convinced if you have good arguments.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.