Issue information

Issue ID
#2301
Status
Invalid
Severity
None
Started
Hercules Elf Bot
Oct 1, 2008 21:39
Last Post
Hercules Elf Bot
Apr 4, 2012 9:08
Confirmation
N/A

Hercules Elf Bot - Oct 1, 2008 21:39

Originally posted by [b]jurgens[/b]
http://www.eathena.ws/board/index.php?autocom=bugtracker&showbug=2301

From what I always knew of resist cards vs stun,
such a stal golem which is a 20% resist vs stun are a resist of your base vit. So if you you have 50 vit, you will gain 20% of that.. which is 10% more resist.


Now I have come across people on high rate servers stacking resist cards and gears.

Valkyrie's Armor, Stalactic Golem card, Gemini-S58 card.
Which is 50%, 20%, and 30%.
People use this and gain stun immunity, and have ridiculous builds which have 340 flee and stun immunity with 1 vit.
Suerly this isn't supposed to work like this?

From what I understand from using these cards you should just get 100% more resitance on top pf your total vit. SO if you have 10 total vit the resitance becomes as if it were 20... NOT STUN IMMUNITY as if you had 97 total vit.


Can someone please confirm if this is working correctly? I really don't see how it could be...

Also I'd like to point out that having anyone of the cards or valk armour combined with 90 total vit does not give you stun immunity, if this doesn't gain immunity then how can 1 base vit gain immunity through the same cards? It doesn't make sense...

This post has been edited by jurgens: Oct 1 2008, 02:59 PM

Hercules Elf Bot - Dec 10, 2011 0:45

Originally posted by [b]Ind[/b]
a quote from the original bug report explaining why it's invalid.
[quote]
Chance to get stunned: 100% * (100-vit)% * (100-equip resist)%

So in your example with 50 vit and 20% resist from cards:
Chance to get stunned: 100% * (100-50)% * (100-20)% = 100% * 50% * 80% = 40% which is 60% resist total

In your example with 1 vit and 50%, 20%, and 30% resist from cards/equips:
Chance to get stunned: 100% * (100-1)% * (100-(50+20+30))% = 100% * 99% * 0% = 0% which is 100% resist total[/quote]