Issue information

Issue ID
#5353
Status
Needs more Info
Severity
None
Started
Hercules Elf Bot
Feb 19, 2012 13:40
Last Post
Hercules Elf Bot
Feb 20, 2012 12:07
Confirmation
Yes (0)
No (1)

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 19, 2012 13:40

Originally posted by [b]ngek202[/b]
[b]SVN Rev: 15614[/b]
REMODE: 1 and 0

when Falcon is present and Attacking (with High LUK Stat 200+ above /Crit 80+ above)
It lowers the Chances of auto casting [b]bAutoSpell[/b].

affects High rate Server that uses 200+ above Stats.

Info:
Bow with Turtle General Card (bonus3 bAutoSpell,"SM_MAGNUM",10,30;) and Bow has a bAutoSpell AC_DOUBLE.
i think even from Armors or Accessory that has a bAutoSpell.

Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqgUevbRdLU

This post has been edited by ngek202 on Feb 19, 2012 18:33

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 19, 2012 14:38

Originally posted by [b]Wildcard[/b]
Cannot reproduce with a Double Bound and TG cards, REMODE or not. Are you using a clean build, or are there any other circumstances that I might be missing?

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 19, 2012 15:04

Originally posted by [b]ngek202[/b]
tried it also with Double Bound, it's clean build I only added my custom added Weapon.
I'm currently uploading a 2nd Video with Double Bound and 3 TG's on it.

This post has been edited by ngek202 on Feb 19, 2012 15:13

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 19, 2012 15:44

Originally posted by [b]ngek202[/b]
here's the 2nd one
[url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yslCW0qOIKQ"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yslCW0qOIKQ[/url]

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 19, 2012 16:29

Originally posted by [b]ngek202[/b]
I've tried to raise the Double Bound's AC_DOUBLE chance to 50% and yes it did cast AC_DOUBLE but lower chances with Falcon present. so one thing I noticed that when the Falcon is present it lowers the chances of AutoSpell getting cast?

This post has been edited by ngek202 on Feb 19, 2012 16:50

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 19, 2012 17:43

Originally posted by [b]ngek202[/b]
[s]Please delete my bad tried with a Normal Character and problem doesn't show up.. seems weird to me /panic[/s]
ok forgot to put a LUK on the new Sniper I tried so it really does Lower the Chances of bAutoSpell when Falcon is present and Attacking.

This post has been edited by ngek202 on Feb 19, 2012 17:54

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 19, 2012 20:11

Originally posted by [b]Wildcard[/b]
It is entirely possible that the recent measures against modified act files (enforcing amotion for skills), combined with 100% auto-blitzbeat effectively prevent any other autocast skill from getting a chance to cast. I faintly recall that autocast skills are suppose to ignore all delays and cast regardless, but we'd need an official source on that, I'm afraid.

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 20, 2012 4:56

Originally posted by [b]ngek202[/b]
that's what I remember on past too while I was still playing on a previous Private Server (DarkRO) too dunno what emulator they're using though bAutoSpell still casts regardless if the Falcon is Auto Attacking at 90% to 100% rate. but on Retail Server we can't fully test this because they don't reach/exceed such Stats not sure if it's possible for a Level 150 Ranger to reach a 80+ Crit to 90 to achieve a 90/100% Auto Blitz.. so that again don't have access to kRO or iRO to test it /oops

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 20, 2012 10:19

Originally posted by [b]Wildcard[/b]
With a large enough sample size, it should actually be possible to test this even with a comparatively low level sniper.

Steps I have in mind (would need to do this both with and without falcon)
- get an autocast skill with a decent trigger chance, and as much luk as possible
- get as many stone arrows as you can carry
- record the packets
- auto-attack a geo in a remote location
- parse the packets for autoskill procs

If there is enough of a derivation between the two scenarios, it would be safe to say that our current implementation is correct.

This post has been edited by Wildcard on Feb 20, 2012 10:21

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 20, 2012 10:54

Originally posted by [b]ngek202[/b]
I wanna try it too uhmm yeah how do you record the packets?

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 20, 2012 11:38

Originally posted by [b]Wildcard[/b]
Wireshark will do, but bear in mind that

1) this needs to be done on an [i]official[/i] server to have any sort of significance
2) official servers have some sort of anti-cheat protection, and I cannot vouch for what will happen if you try to use Wireshark there

Hercules Elf Bot - Feb 20, 2012 12:07

Originally posted by [b]ngek202[/b]
well that is not good to hear :(